A Thought Experiment On How Google's New Palestine Page Could Undermine Peace Talks
The Israeli Foreign Minister has sent a strongly worded letter to Google CEO, Larry Page, warning him that their new Palestine search page could undermine Middle-East peace negotiations. “Such a decision is in my opinion not only mistaken but could also negatively impinge on the efforts of my government to bring about direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority,” wrote minister Ze’ev Elkin, about Google’s decision to change “Palestinian Territories” to “Palestine” on Google.ps (picture above). Careful followers of foreign policy news might question how exactly a tiny word change on a website could upset arguably the most resource-intensive diplomatic effort in human history, but we think such skepticism underestimates Google’s vast geo-political power. Here’s a thought experiment of 5 different ways Google could have a meaningful impact: 1. Well, maybe Google could…no, that wouldn’t do anything 2. … 3. … 4. … 5. … Ok, we can’t think ...
authorities
bbc
british
china
corporations
decision
dictatorship
difference
discussion
elkin
experiment
google ceo
governance
government
guardian
icann
internet
iran
iso
israel
israeli
larry
middle-east
middle-eastern
minister
nathan
nation
negotiations
north korea
opinion
organisation
organization
palestine
palestinian
policy
questions
region
skepticism
standardisation
tyler
united
Israel's Barak, architect of Iran policy, quitting politics
JERUSALEM - Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on Monday he was quitting politics, a surprise decision that deepens uncertainty over how Israel will confront Iran's nuclear program.
decision
defense minister
ehud barak
iran
israel
jerusalem
policy
Found more than 1 month ago on channel
Reuters
Third 2012 US Presidential Debate Tonight: Discuss Here
Tonight marks the third and final U.S. Presidential debate in the lead-up to the election on November 6th. It starts at 9PM ET (6PM PT, 0100 UTC), and it's taking place at Lynn University in Florida. The topic this time around is foreign policy, including discussions of Afghanistan and Pakistan, Israel and Iran, America's role in the world, "The Changing Middle East and the New Face of Terrorism," and China's rise as a superpower. You can livestream it from the usual suspects: (C-SPAN, ABC, PBS, CNN). Politifact has posted an article fact-checking statements the candidates have made about foreign policy. Both they and Factcheck.org will be using Twitter to verify statements in real time. This presidential debate again excludes the smaller U.S. political parties. If you're interested in hearing other voices, you'll be able to see candidates from the Libertarian, Green, Constitution, and Justice parties in a debate tomorrow with Larry King moderating. As before, we're doing a separate post ...
abc
afghanistan
america
bingo
c-span
china
cnn
constitution
conversation
discussion
election
factcheck
fallacies
florida
green
iran
israel
justice
king
larry
libertarian
lynn
middle east
pakistan
pbs
policy
politifact
ryanator
statement
terrorism
twitter
university
utc
Found more than 1 month ago on channel
Slashdot
Romney would back an Israeli strike at Iran, aide says
Romney 'would respect' a decision to attack Tehran's nuclear capability, says a foreign policy adviser while giving a preview of the Republican candidate's speech later today. Mitt Romney would back an Israeli military strike against Iran aimed at preventing Tehran from obtaining nuclear capability, a top foreign policy adviser said early Sunday, outlining the aggressive posture the Republican presidential candidate will take toward Iran in a speech in Israel later in the day.
capabilities
decision
iran
israel
israeli
mitt romney
policy
republican
tehran