IRS Admits Targeting Conservative Groups During 2012 Election
An anonymous reader writes "A recurring theme in comments on Slashdot since the 9/11 attacks has been concern about the use of government power to monitor or suppress political activity unassociated with terrorism but rather based on ideology. It has just been revealed that the IRS has in fact done that. From the story: "The Internal Revenue Service inappropriately flagged conservative political groups for additional reviews during the 2012 election . . . Organizations were singled out because they included the words 'tea party' or 'patriot' in their applications for tax-exempt status, said Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups. In some cases, groups were asked for their list of donors, which violates IRS policy in most cases, she said. 'That was wrong. That was absolutely incorrect, it was insensitive and it was inappropriate. That's not how we go about selecting cases for further review,' Lerner said . . . 'The IRS would like to apologize for that,' she ...
action
activity
applications
cincinnati
comments
conference
decision
division
election
government
ideology
irs
lerner
lois
national
organization
policy
practice
president obama
responsibility
service
slashdot
tea
terrorism
Your Content, Now Mobile
We are pleased to present you with this excerpt from Chapter 1 of Content Strategy for Mobile by Karen McGrane, now available from A Book Apart . —Ed. When we talk about how to create products and services for mobile, the conversation tends to focus on design and development challenges. How does our design aesthetic change when we’re dealing with a smaller (or higher-resolution) screen? How do we employ (and teach) new gestural interactions that take advantage of touchscreen capabilities? How (and who) will write the code for all these different platforms—and how will we maintain all of them? Great questions, every one. But focusing just on the design and development questions leaves out one important subject: how are we going to get our content to render appropriately on mobile devices? The good news is that the answer to this question will help you, regardless of operating system, device capabilities, or screen resolution. If you take the time to figure out the right way to get your ...
activity
alas
amtrak
applications
argument
assumption
audience
austin
beware
blackberry
bowles
business
capabilities
cennydd
choice
cloudfour
club
conference
connectivity
convenience
conversation
decision
determination
development
discussion
eighty-six
enhancements
environment
experience
facebook
fig
flexibility
freedom
functionality
google
grigsby
guardian
impressions
information
interaction
investment
iphone
isolation
iteration
jason
karen
location
luke
majority
management
mcgrane
membership
microsoft office
minority
misconception
mission
mobileportland
navigation
options
parity
policy
preferences
question
resolution
responsibility
rss
securecube
service
session
situation
solution
south
southwest
texas
twitter
united airlines
url
vision
wi-fi
workstations
wroblewski
Paul Irish on Chrome Moving to Blink
I know you’ve been asked this plenty of times already, but: no new vendor prefixes, right? Right? Nope, none! They’re great in theory but turns out they fail in practice, so we’re joining Mozilla and the W3C CSS WG and moving away them. There’s a few parts to this. Firstly, we won’t be migrating the existing -webkit- prefixed properties to a -chrome- or -blink- prefix, that’d just make extra work for everyone. Secondly, we inherited some existing properties that are prefixed. Some, like -webkit-transform , are standards track and we work with the CSS WG to move ahead those standards while we fix any remaining issues in our implementation and we’ll unprefix them when they’re ready. Others, like -webkit-box-reflect are not standards track and we’ll bring them to standards bodies or responsibly deprecate these on a case-by-case basis. Lastly, we’re not introducing any new CSS properties behind a prefix. Pinky swear? Totes. New stuff will be available to experiment with behind ...
adobe
ambitions
android
apple
applications
blink-powered
canary
chris
chrome
chromebook
chromeos
chromium
coffeescript
commitment
compatibility
confirmation
conformance
css
darin
dart
decision
deprecation
dev
development
devtools
divergence
dom
emscripten
expectations
experience
experiment
firstly
fisher
freedom
google
haha
implementation
integration
interoperability
ios
irish
javascript
javascriptcore
lastly
limitations
linux
mac
maintenance
management
mention
mozilla
non-webkit
nope
oilpan
opera
paul
performance
pinky
policy
practice
priority
quality
rangeexception
recalculation
resistance
safari
scalability
secondly
simplicity
technology
tradition
typescript
vbscript-y
version
webkit
webkit-based
wilson
windows
xmlhttprequestexception
China April factory output disappoints, clouds outlook
BEIJING - China's factory output growth was surprisingly muted in April, darkening the outlook for the Chinese economic recovery and feeding expectations that the government may take policy action to support activity.
action
activity
beijing
china
chinese
expectations
government
policy
Found 1 week ago on channel
Reuters
Federal Circuit Rules Software Invention Unpatentable
Editor's note: Anthony J. Lombardi practices patent litigation and patent prosecution at Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. He also provides counseling to clients on prelitigation strategy, portfolio development, patent monetization, and licensing activities. A clear legal standard for determining patent-eligible subject matter remains elusive. On Friday, the Federal Circuit, in CLS Bank International v. Alice Corporation, ruled that an invention involving software for a computerized trading platform does not constitute patent?eligible subject matter. The decision -- which spanned 135 pages -- by a 10-member en banc panel of the Court included seven separate opinions, but not the clarity many had hoped for.
activity
alice
anthony
bank
circuit
clarity
cls
corporations
decision
development
dunner
farabow
finnegan
garrett
henderson
invention
litigation
llp
lombardi
monetization
opinion
practice
prelitigation
prosecution