Paul Irish on Chrome Moving to Blink
I know you’ve been asked this plenty of times already, but: no new vendor prefixes, right? Right? Nope, none! They’re great in theory but turns out they fail in practice, so we’re joining Mozilla and the W3C CSS WG and moving away them. There’s a few parts to this. Firstly, we won’t be migrating the existing -webkit- prefixed properties to a -chrome- or -blink- prefix, that’d just make extra work for everyone. Secondly, we inherited some existing properties that are prefixed. Some, like -webkit-transform , are standards track and we work with the CSS WG to move ahead those standards while we fix any remaining issues in our implementation and we’ll unprefix them when they’re ready. Others, like -webkit-box-reflect are not standards track and we’ll bring them to standards bodies or responsibly deprecate these on a case-by-case basis. Lastly, we’re not introducing any new CSS properties behind a prefix. Pinky swear? Totes. New stuff will be available to experiment with behind ...
adobe
ambitions
android
apple
applications
blink-powered
canary
chris
chrome
chromebook
chromeos
chromium
coffeescript
commitment
compatibility
confirmation
conformance
css
darin
dart
decision
deprecation
dev
development
devtools
divergence
dom
emscripten
expectations
experience
experiment
firstly
fisher
freedom
google
haha
implementation
integration
interoperability
ios
irish
javascript
javascriptcore
lastly
limitations
linux
mac
maintenance
management
mention
mozilla
non-webkit
nope
oilpan
opera
paul
performance
pinky
policy
practice
priority
quality
rangeexception
recalculation
resistance
safari
scalability
secondly
simplicity
technology
tradition
typescript
vbscript-y
version
webkit
webkit-based
wilson
windows
xmlhttprequestexception
The Post Post-PC Era: Will Apple, Google, Samsung, Amazon Or Microsoft Win?
Editor’s note: Peter Relan is a former developer and Oracle’s former VP of Internet Division, a serial entrepreneur since 1998, and a Silicon Valley angel investor. Relan founded YouWeb Incubator in 2007, spinning out a string of successful mobile and gaming companies. Follow him on Twitter @prelan. Even before Apple’s 10 percent stock dip, it was clear that one battle was already over. Put down your arms – Android has won the smartphone OS marketshare war. The competitive drama of the smartphone battle has already unfolded to a large extent and is well understood: Android dominates unit shipment volumes, while iPhone dominates profits associated with smartphones. It may seem like too early a claim, but history tells us Google’s Android distribution model puts the large part of the smartphone market in its corner. No other OS has seen a reversal of fortune this late in the game (think Windows in the early ’90s and Nokia with feature phones in the early aughts). And yet, many ...
activity
advance
amazon
android
apple
bric
choice
designation
development
devices
distribution
division
explosion
facebook
google
influence
internet
ipad
iphone
microsoft
nexus
nokia
oracle
pcs
peter relan
post-pc
post-pc-era
productivity
retina
samsung
shipments
silicon valley
technology
twitter
windows
x-inch
youweb
Steve Jobs Was Wrong About Touchscreen Laptops
theodp writes "Don't believe everything Steve Jobs and Tim Cook tell you, advises The Verge's Sean Hollister. Gunshy of touchscreen laptops after hearing the two Apple CEOs dismiss the technology (Jobs: 'Touch surfaces don't want to be vertical.' Cook: 'You can converge a toaster and a refrigerator, but those things are probably not gonna be pleasing to the user.'), Hollister was surprised to discover that Windows 8 touchscreen laptops actually don't suck and that the dreaded 'Gorilla Arm Syndrome' did not materialize. 'The more I've used Windows 8, despite its faults, the more I've become convinced that touchscreens are the future — even vertical ones,' writes Hollister. 'We've been looking at this all wrong. A touchscreen isn't a replacement for a keyboard or mouse, it's a complement.' Echoing a prediction from Coding Horror's Jeff Atwood that 'it is only a matter of time before all laptops must be touch laptops,' Hollister wouldn't be surprised at all if Apple eventually embraces-and-extends ...
apple
arm
atwood
ceos
complement
gunshy
hollister
ipad
jeff
microsoft
predictions
replacement
sean
steve
technology
tim cook
windows
Found more than 1 month ago on channel
Slashdot
Why Eric Schmidt Is Wrong About Microsoft Not Mattering Anymore
First time accepted submitter Gumbercules!! writes "Eric Schmidt said he believes there is a 'Gang of Four' technology platform leaders — Google, Apple, Amazon and Facebook — Microsoft isn't one of them. I wrote about why I believe he's wrong and what it might say about Google's weaknesses. From the article: 'It’s no secret that Microsoft have utterly failed to make significant roads into the mobile market place. Windows Phone 7 has approximately no marketshare (ok they have live 5% or so) and this has actually gone down over the last year. It’s also no secret that Microsoft have failed to gain any semblance of “cool” and that they’re also managing to drag Nokia down with them. It’s not even a secret that nearly everyone who looks at the new Windows 8 interface-formally-known-as-Metro doesn’t like it. However this isn’t the whole story.'"
amazon
apple
eric schmidt
facebook
google
gumbercules
interface-formally-known-as-metro
mattering
microsoft
nokia
semblance
technology
weakness
windows
Found more than 1 month ago on channel
Slashdot
The Case That Apple Should Buy Nokia
Hugh Pickens writes "Nokia has seen better days. The Finnish phone maker continues to struggle to gain traction in a marketplace dominated by Apple and Android, and its new flagship device, the Windows-powered Lumia 920, failed to impress investors when it was announced last month, subsequently causing the company's stock to dive. Now Tristan Louis argues that there are four good reasons Apple should dig into its deep pockets and buy Nokia. First Nokia has really powerful mapping technology. Apple Maps isn't very good, and Apple has been feeling the heat from a critical tech press but Nokia has been doing maps 'for a long time now, and they a have access to even more data than Google." Next, Nokia has a treasure chest of patents and as Apple's recent smackdown of Samsung proves, the future of the mobile space 'will be dictated by the availability and ownership of patents.' Nokia's exhaustive portfolio of patents might be worth as much as $6 billion to $10 billion, a drop in the bucket from ...
android
apple
availability
finnish
flagship
forbes
google
hugh pickens
ipads
iphones
louis
lumia
maps
microsoft
nokia
ownership
samsung
technology
traction
tristan
upbin
windows
windows-powered
Found more than 1 month ago on channel
Slashdot